Archive for the ‘Theology – Soteriology’ Category

Rembrandt: The Rsurrection of Christ

Rembrandt: The Rsurrection of Christ

Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. Therefore let us, as many as are mature, have this mind; and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal even this to you. ” (Philippians 3:12–15, NKJV)

 

Lent is a time reserved by the Church for Christians to contemplate their sinfulness in light of the work of Christ on their behalf – anticipating the celebration of the Resurrection of Jesus. In Christ, we know that we have no righteousness of our own, and that we have been so united to His death and resurrection that we too have a new life to live for and in Him (Phil. 3:8-11). Christ has grabbed hold of us in all our sinfulness – and made us new creatures in Him. And so, we leave what has gone before, forgetting our sin and guilt, forgetting all of the injustices done to us, and press on toward the goal of mature righteousness in Him. We, in this life, will never come to the place that we have been fully perfected, or attained a full righteousness, or fully apprehended all that we can of Christ. However, we can say that we are maturing in faith and righteousness.

The problem from many people is that they remain trapped in the past. Some are so focused on the enormity of their sins that they struggle or refuse to perceive and experience the infinite capacity of God to forgive. Others are so consumed by the sins committed against them that, in their experience of victimhood, they can neither see that Jesus was the most victimized person in history, nor that His sacrifice can free them from their past. For these poor sinners, theirs is a failure to understand that Jesus forgives them sufficiently to empower them to forgive those who have trespassed against them.

The ongoing celebration of Easter is the reminder that all that has gone before is nothing compared to the future that God has planned for us who are in Christ Jesus. Easter is the proclamation that the power of Christ’s resurrection can free us from the power of all sin. We do not have to be slaves to our own iniquities, nor the trespasses of others. In Christ, we are assured that we too are (even now) raised from our deadness to life.

Forgetting what has gone before is not an act of trivializing sin (either ours or others). It is not letting ourselves or others off too easily. Forgetting those things which are behind is an act of faith in Christ, who moves us forward into the future of peace, hope and joy! Leaving behind all the sin and guilt and victimization, and pressing on toward the goal is the gift of maturity that Christ gives to those who trust in Him.

 The Gospel in All its Forms

Christianity Today (by Tim Keller | posted 5/23/2008)

I recently received a request to comment on this article by Tim Keller.  I created a file to easily read the article here.  I very much like Keller’s perspective and I hope that it gets a wide reading.  I won’t take the time to go through it point by point. However, I do think that he presents some very compelling remarks about various forms of the gospel and how we can use these forms to help us in our own presentations of the good news. His final paragraph gives a good summary of his reason for writing:

Today there are many who doubt that there is just one gospel. That gives them the warrant to ignore the gospel of atonement and justification. There are others who don’t like to admit that there are different forms to that one gospel. That smacks too much of “contextualization,” a term they dislike. They cling to a single presentation that is often one-dimensional. Neither of these approaches is as true to the biblical material, nor as effective in actual ministry, as that which understands that the Bible presents one gospel in several forms.

I primarily want to make a few simple but important points to expand on what Keller offered:

1)    The gospel is always contemporarily good news to those to whom it is announced. To illustrate my point: To say that we in the United States of America are no longer under British rule is good news generally, but would have been even better news to Americans in the late 1700’s. Thus, it (the gospel) has its power in people’s lives when there is something new and applicable in the announcement of the news to them. It changes their situation in the world.

a.     People (the Jews and Gentile God-fearers) in the first century AD knew experientially about salvation by grace through faith. They knew that they needed a vicarious sacrificial offering to cover their sin. To be told that this is the gospel would not be such good news – because they already knew these things and felt the power of them.

b.     What they didn’t know was the means by which God would fulfill His promises throughout history to that point. To those who lived in the days following the death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus – the gospel was good news because all of the biblical and prophetic expectations were met in the person of Jesus. He is the seed of the woman that would crush the head of the serpent. He is the descendent of Abraham through whom the nations of the world would be blessed. He is the son of David who would rule forever at the right hand of God the Father. He is the Messiah, the Son of God, who would bring forth the Kingdom of God, and right the wrongs of the world. Now this was good news indeed! The coming of Jesus changed everything in their world for them.

c.      To those (pagans throughout the world) who knew nothing of salvation by grace through faith, or the promises of God, the gospel was good news because it gave to them an understanding of who the one true God is, salvation from sin and death, freedom from oppression (both human and Satanic) by living as servants of Christ, and hope for the future (both in history and eternity). The announcement of the gospel meant an entirely new way of relating to the world around them.

2)    Our presentation of the gospel today must have the same sense of relevance that it did to the Jews and to the Gentiles of the first century. It is the answer to all of the problems faced by men today.

3)    We live in a time when Christians no longer know how to speak into the world situation in such a way that people for the first time see the solution to their troubles personally and the resolution of the problems of the world. As Keller so well explained, we need to learn to articulate the good news so that it feels like good news to people.

Keller tells us that the one simple gospel can be understood in a three-point outline:

1)    That Jesus was the promised Messianic King and Son of God come to earth as a servant, in human form. (Rom. 1:3-4; Phil. 2:4ff.). I would add that Jesus came to reveal the Father (Jn. 1:14, 18).

2)    By his death and resurrection, Jesus atoned for our sin and secured our justification by grace, not by our works (1 Cor. 15:3ff.).

3)    On the cross Jesus broke the dominion of sin and evil over us (Col. 2:13-15) and at his return he will complete what he began by the renewal of the entire material creation and the resurrection of our bodies (Rom 8:18ff.). I would add that the implications of this point of the gospel extend to all of life that we live in history. Thus, in Christ, humanity will experience over time a renewal of all of life, including culture and the products of culture.

4)    I must add a fourth point: Christ is operating in the world through His Body, the Church. However imperfectly she appears, the Church is the Body of Christ, through whom the world is being transformed. There is no salvation apart from Christ or His Church.

How we articulate this good news to our world is informed by the way the New Testament communicates it: by speaking of the gospel in its various forms or manifestations to various people in various ways. Keller does a marvelous job in making clear how applicable these different expressions of the gospel are. May God, by His Spirit, enlighten us individually and corporately as the Church, to learn to present the gospel in such a way that it is truly felt to be good news to our modern world!

 

 

While theological erudition and meticulousness have their place in the Church -Simple faith in Jesus is what God calls us to.

Too often Christians argue about the finer points of salvation by grace through faith (including all the important distinctions between the grounds and instrumentality of justification) – forgetting that Jesus said:

“Then Jesus called a little child to Him, set him in the midst of them, and said, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore whoever humbles himself as this little child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.’” (Matthew 18:2–4, NKJV)

Jesus is found, known and loved by the humblest of His children – The Kingdom of Heaven is populated with wonderfully surprising people whom God loves despite their lack of theological precision. When we die and go to heaven – we will not be met with resistance, a theological exam or a need to talk our way in. We will be welcomed and lovingly received!

Forrest Gump is one of my favorite movies! This humorous story was passed on to me – and I couldn’t resist sharing it :-D

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The day finally arrived. Forrest Gump dies and goes to Heaven. He is at the Pearly Gates, met by St. Peter himself. However, the gates are closed, and Forrest approaches the gatekeeper.

St. Peter said, ‘Well, Forrest, it is certainly good to see you. We  have heard a lot about you. I must tell you, though, that the place is filling up fast, and we have been administering an entrance examination for everyone. The test is short, but you have to pass it before you can get into Heaven.’

Forrest responds, ‘It sure is good to be here, St. Peter, sir. But nobody ever told me about any entrance exam. I sure hope that the test ain’t too hard..Life was a big enough test as it was.’

St. Peter continued, ‘Yes, I know, Forrest, but the test is only three questions.

First: What two days of the week begin with the letter T?

Second: How many seconds are there in a year?

Third: What is God’s first name?’

Forrest leaves to think the questions over. He returns the next day and sees St. Peter, who waves him up, and says, ‘Now that you have had a chance to think the questions over, tell me your answers.’

Forrest replied, ‘Well, the first one — which two days in the week begins with the letter ‘T’?  Shucks, that one is easy. That would be Today and Tomorrow.’

The Saint’s eyes opened wide and he exclaimed, ‘Forrest, that is not what I was thinking, but you do have a point, and I guess I did not specify, so I will give you credit for that answer. How about the next one?’ asked St. Peter.

‘How many seconds in a year? Now that one is harder,’ replied Forrest, ‘but I thunk and thunk about that, and I guess the only answer can be twelve.’

Astounded, St. Peter said, ‘Twelve? Twelve? Forrest, how in Heaven’s name could you come up with twelve seconds in a year?’

Forrest replied, ‘Shucks, there’s got to be twelve: January 2nd, February 2nd, March 2nd…. ‘

‘Hold it,’ interrupts St. Peter. ‘I see where you are going with this, and I see your point, though that was not quite what I had in mind….but I will have to give you credit for that one, too. Let us go on with the third and final question. Can you tell me God’s first name’?

‘Sure,’ Forrest replied, ‘it’s Andy.’

‘Andy?’ exclaimed an exasperated and frustrated St Peter. ‘Ok, I can understand how you came up with your answers to my first two questions, but just how in the world did you come up with the name Andy as the first name of God?’

‘Shucks, that was the easiest one of all,’ Forrest replied. ‘I learnt it from the song,

ANDY WALKS WITH ME,

ANDY TALKS WITH ME,

ANDY TELLS ME I AM HIS OWN.’

St. Peter opened the Pearly Gates, and said: ‘Run, Forrest, run.’

One of the most influential things that I have read is J. I. Packer’s Introduction to The Death of Death in the Death of Christ, which I first ready in the summer of 1984.

J.I. Packer - One of the Great and Influential Reformed  Evangelicals

J.I. Packer - One of the Great and Influential Reformed Evangelicals

I was doing  ministry work in Los Angeles during the 1984 summer Olympics, when I met and stayed in the home of wonderful and scholarly gentleman – who also happened to be a strong and articulate Calvinist.  As I was ready to complete my last semester at Multnomah School of the Bible, I thought myself wise, fully informed and well able to engage and debate a mature, committed Reformed Christian (doctoral candidate in philosophy) about the errors of his theology and practice.

Fortunately for me, he was as gracious as he was persuasive. Upon leaving his office for the last time, he handed me Packer’s wonderful Introduction, and asked me to give it a careful read, which I promised to do.

I have been a committed Calvinist since then!!!

Last Sunday I saw that a man in our church was reading the Introduction and had to comment on it.  You can read it in full here!

Let me know what you think!

Creation of Adam

Ostensible [Neo-Evangelical] Conservatives Temper Longman & Peter Enns both have a difficult time with the biblical record of creation  – and while wanting to be faithful to the Bible (we should seldom try to read motives into other peoples’ statements – but I do so with a judgment of charity) they are in effect more faithful to the world’s conception of reality than Paul or Luke or Jude.

Open questions about whether the Bible actually means to teach that Adam was a literal father to all mankind (a highly “literalistic way of reading Genesis ,” oh, my – not that!), or whether there is possibly an evolutionary process, and the word Adam just stands for “mankind” in general? Hmmmmmmm. What else could be an open question?

Does God Talk to Us Through Fiction? Unpacking a Non-Literal Interpretation of the Bible

If there is real reason to doubt that God created a literal Adam from whom all mankind descended isn’t there also reason to doubt the Bible’s claims about the second Adam – Jesus the Christ, the God- man? Perennially, this has been the crux of the matter. Is Jesus who He claims to be? Is Jesus who the Apostles and the NT claims Him to be? If not, we remain in our sins for He could never be the biblical sacrifice for our sins, nor could He forgive sins. If Jesus is not God in human flesh – we have no hope in this world or in eternity. But if He is the God-man He is the Lord of all as the Creator-God, and the Lord and sustainer of all things. As J. Gresham Machen said in “On the Deity of Christ”:

But now is Christ our Saviour, the one who says, “Thy sins are forgiven thee,” revealed as very God. And we believe. Such a faith is a mystery to us who possess it; it seems folly to those who have it not. But if possessed it delivers us forever from fear. The world to us is all unknown; it is engulfed in an ocean of infinity. But it contains no mysteries to our Saviour. He is on the throne. He pervades the remotest bounds. He inhabits infinity. With such a Saviour we are safe.

Baalism says the Sun married the Mud and the world came up. Egypt said so to. So does modern “science.” The difference is that what were personal forces back then are now impersonal forces. And that ain’t a dime’s worth of difference.

This is a debate that included someone that I know of, Steve Jeffery, from one the email news groups I am a member of. This debate is between Jacques More (non-Calvinist) and Dr. Steve Jeffery (Calvinist). Jacques More is on You Tube and his channel name is GraceTruthGuy: http://www.youtube.com/gracetruthguy Also, here is the link to Jacques personal website: http://www.jarom.net Dr. Steve Jeffery is a minister at Emmanuel Evangelical Church- http://www.northlondonchurch.org There is more information about each debater at the beginning of the debate.

From the the Refuting Calvinism YouTube Channel: RefutingCalvinism – June 02, 2010 |